Yes, Sweetie, that is the takeaway from this article. If someone, like myself, who lives in a deep red state, who has never met a Palestinian in person, and who might experience repercussions for suggesting that genociding Palestinians is evil, actually, can sit here, having read this entire article and take the time to respond to your stupid ass and scream at you "YES, GAZA IS FUCKING SPEAKING, YOU DIMWIT!", then yes, I'd say that substantiates the notion that the deep resonance of the trauma being inflicted upon Palestinians is being, not just heard, but deeply felt by those of us with ears to hear and souls to keep.
The wealthy have a definite plan for Gaza. It doesn’t include Palestinians. There will be another Trail of Tears. Indigenous peoples are always decimated and displaced.
Gaza is priceless. $5k and some food to the owners for their land? That is a sick joke. The US has no right or mandate whatsoever to “administrate” Gaza. This is nothing more than illegal occupation attempting to legitimize itself.
With respect for your writing, conclusions, and observations, I can't help but wonder how 86% of the scholars came to the conclusion that genocide was taking place. I, too, have described it as genocide, but after reading your article, I could not help but ask what data supports the conclusion. I researched pre- and post-2023 infant mortality rates and found that the destruction of the healthcare system has made it impossible to track post-October 2023 IMR. This data would lend itself to quantifying Clause "D" of Article II. In addition, I have found no evidence that supports Clause"E." Certainly, there is evidence that A through C is happening, and pronouncements by Israeli conservatives make the case for "intent." Trump's gross $5000 bribe may very well be evidence that he is attempting to stave off genocide by providing a way out for the Palestinians other than through death. I am not saying his plan is good or even moral, but he may be trying to lessen the death toll. But there are many ways he could be more effective if that were his objective. Do you think that the scholars reached their conclusion based upon the preponderance of the evidence as opposed to strict data-related evidence?
It's absolutely hypocrisy. I don't want Palestinians to have to leave the Gaza Strip and not be able to return. But my number one concern is for as many as possible of them to survive. So if they actually do get to leave and it's not just another lie. I don't know how it will be possible to relocate 2 million people. But if it means their survival. Justice can come later, their return may one day be possible. Things is happening in Israel now and if the UK and others actually keep their word. Palestine (in the West Bank, but still) will get recognized as a state.
I don't see that it matters what anyone else wants Palestinians to do, it's their decision and they know that leaving means they will be completely removed from the map and, there will never be any return for them or their descendants, ever.
And the same will happen to the rest of the Middle East by power hungry, lying zionists--from so many other countries--that have no rights, legal or otherwise, to the land of Palestine.
I absolutely agree. It should be their decicion. Not coerced. And yes if this works Israel will do the same, first in the West Bank. Then try to expand. But they are losing support from their allies. Canada, France and the UK says they will recognize the Palestinian state (in the West Bank) if Israel doesn't improve the humanitarian situation by September. So now we will see if France , Canada and the UK lied.
Where are they going to go? No one wants them - certainly not as a whole group. A mass exodus would be destabilizing for any country they pass through, much less settle in. You would have to break them up into small groups and fly them out of the region for it to be successful. Western nations won't take them.
The ones relocating should be the incomers with no roots to the area, except in their lies to get some fools in government to allot them SOME land in Palestine, but without asking the indigenous peoplewho have thousand of years of ancestry to that land.
What a moving article! Thank you Ahmad for all you do. None of us are truly free until Palestine is Free 🇵🇸
A brilliant analysis! Free Palestine
Yes, Sweetie, that is the takeaway from this article. If someone, like myself, who lives in a deep red state, who has never met a Palestinian in person, and who might experience repercussions for suggesting that genociding Palestinians is evil, actually, can sit here, having read this entire article and take the time to respond to your stupid ass and scream at you "YES, GAZA IS FUCKING SPEAKING, YOU DIMWIT!", then yes, I'd say that substantiates the notion that the deep resonance of the trauma being inflicted upon Palestinians is being, not just heard, but deeply felt by those of us with ears to hear and souls to keep.
The wealthy have a definite plan for Gaza. It doesn’t include Palestinians. There will be another Trail of Tears. Indigenous peoples are always decimated and displaced.
Gaza is priceless. $5k and some food to the owners for their land? That is a sick joke. The US has no right or mandate whatsoever to “administrate” Gaza. This is nothing more than illegal occupation attempting to legitimize itself.
How do we STOP THIS?
Free Palestine 🇵🇸
Conman Trump duped a lot of people. He is a war criminal along with Biden, Obama and the Bushes and Clinton and Reagan, etc.
With respect for your writing, conclusions, and observations, I can't help but wonder how 86% of the scholars came to the conclusion that genocide was taking place. I, too, have described it as genocide, but after reading your article, I could not help but ask what data supports the conclusion. I researched pre- and post-2023 infant mortality rates and found that the destruction of the healthcare system has made it impossible to track post-October 2023 IMR. This data would lend itself to quantifying Clause "D" of Article II. In addition, I have found no evidence that supports Clause"E." Certainly, there is evidence that A through C is happening, and pronouncements by Israeli conservatives make the case for "intent." Trump's gross $5000 bribe may very well be evidence that he is attempting to stave off genocide by providing a way out for the Palestinians other than through death. I am not saying his plan is good or even moral, but he may be trying to lessen the death toll. But there are many ways he could be more effective if that were his objective. Do you think that the scholars reached their conclusion based upon the preponderance of the evidence as opposed to strict data-related evidence?
Very well written . Excellent
It's absolutely hypocrisy. I don't want Palestinians to have to leave the Gaza Strip and not be able to return. But my number one concern is for as many as possible of them to survive. So if they actually do get to leave and it's not just another lie. I don't know how it will be possible to relocate 2 million people. But if it means their survival. Justice can come later, their return may one day be possible. Things is happening in Israel now and if the UK and others actually keep their word. Palestine (in the West Bank, but still) will get recognized as a state.
I don't see that it matters what anyone else wants Palestinians to do, it's their decision and they know that leaving means they will be completely removed from the map and, there will never be any return for them or their descendants, ever.
And the same will happen to the rest of the Middle East by power hungry, lying zionists--from so many other countries--that have no rights, legal or otherwise, to the land of Palestine.
I absolutely agree. It should be their decicion. Not coerced. And yes if this works Israel will do the same, first in the West Bank. Then try to expand. But they are losing support from their allies. Canada, France and the UK says they will recognize the Palestinian state (in the West Bank) if Israel doesn't improve the humanitarian situation by September. So now we will see if France , Canada and the UK lied.
Where are they going to go? No one wants them - certainly not as a whole group. A mass exodus would be destabilizing for any country they pass through, much less settle in. You would have to break them up into small groups and fly them out of the region for it to be successful. Western nations won't take them.
Thats my concern also, it's not realistic to relocate 2 million people.
The ones relocating should be the incomers with no roots to the area, except in their lies to get some fools in government to allot them SOME land in Palestine, but without asking the indigenous peoplewho have thousand of years of ancestry to that land.