18 Comments
User's avatar
C F's avatar

I think Israel is salivating for this because it knows that Iran will devastate the gulf countries and the US will spend every last interceptor it has to keep Israel safe. So in the end the whole region will be set back while israel is unscathed.

Aamir Razak's avatar

i think that's exactly what they are hoping for cyrus

Val Whitewolf's avatar

You know all narcissist pigs have to have a playbook they can't come up with anything original.

Valence's avatar

And water supply attacks here.

The Custodian ✊✊🏻✊🏽✊🏿🍉💪🏽's avatar

Please please please read and share.

Note 1: The Mask of Imperial Virtue

This tribal blindness uncovers a deeper, darker question: why is the modern West so systematically incapable of recognizing the essential humanity and greatness of people of colour? It is a profound historical and psychological bankruptcy. The very cradle of human dignity, law, and spiritual illumination belongs entirely to the East. The absolute greatest human beings to ever walk the earth—those who taught mankind how to know, worship, and love the Divine—were not white, not black, nor yellow. They were brown men. Yet this empire has weaponized faith, whitewashed the sacred, and trampled upon the very lands that birthed guidance for humanity, replacing divine truth with the cold worship of their own supremacy.

​Noah (as), Abraham (as), Moses (as), Jesus (as), and Muhammad (saw)—to name only a few—carried the exact lineaments, skin tones, and geographies of the very populations the modern West now marginalizes, bombs, and ignores. To see a civilization project a fierce devotion to the message of these Prophets (as) while actively despising or dismissing the humanity of their modern kin is a form of civilizational madness.

​This ultimate irony does not merely border on the blasphemous; it is, in its very essence, blasphemy. These activists march under the banner of Christ, yet they cheer or shrug at the systematic erasure of populations living in the very lands where the Gospel was first preached. They claim that Jesus loves the unborn in the West, but they apparently believe he has no love left for his own relatives—the Semitic, Middle Eastern children who carry the exact lineage, features, and geography of the historical Christ.

​This is not historic Christianity. It is ancient, unfiltered paganism wearing the stolen vestments of faith. As G.K. Chesterton observed with prescient accuracy:

​'The modern world is full of the old Christian virtues gone mad. The virtues have gone mad because they have been isolated from each other and are wandering alone.'

​Here, the virtue of sanctity has been violently severed from justice and mercy, reduced to the primordial worship of the white tribal clan—the idol of imperial dominance, wrapped in a cross and sold as piety. They do not worship the God of mankind; they worship their own geopolitical supremacy.

​It is an established truth of human nature and spiritual law that a religious hypocrite is far more despised than a straightforward, non-religious cynic. The secular actor who acts out of raw self-interest makes no pretence of a higher law; his malice is transparent. But the actor who invokes the Divine, who claims the moral high ground, and who uses the language of sacred scripture to mask a brutal, tribal agenda invites a unique and justified hatred. Allama Iqbal (ra) captured this exact deception when he warned that the moral claims of Western imperial dominance are but silk trappings draped over an iron heart.

Kate's avatar
Aug 1Edited

They won’t defeat the people of Persia.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Aug 1
Comment deleted
Kate's avatar

My thoughts too.

May's avatar

There is no law anymore, we live in a time of gangsters where anything goes

The Custodian ✊✊🏻✊🏽✊🏿🍉💪🏽's avatar

Please please please read and share.

Note 2: The Institutional Barbarian and the Psychological Exit

The world can tolerate a cynic acting out of raw self-interest, but it recoils from a barbarian who mounts the pulpit while sharpening the blade. By using the cross as a shield for imperial violence, they have brought dishonour upon the very faith they claim to defend.

The ancient world recognized the barbarian by his lawlessness and his raw, unrefined brutality. The modern West, however, has perfected a far more sinister specimen: the tech-driven, institutional barbarian. This is the actor who sits in a pristine television studio or an air-conditioned legislative office, speaks fluent human-rights jargon, and then signs off on the weapons, the funding, and the diplomatic cover required to vaporize entire families in their homes.

In the modern pro-life imagination, the virtue of protecting innocence has gone completely insane. It has been detached from reality, turned into a domestic political token to be traded for votes, while being utterly denied to the most vulnerable human beings on earth. They will fight to the point of fanaticism to protect a microscopic cell they cannot see, but will actively justify the blinding, burning, and crushing of a child they can see in high-definition on their phones every single day. Edmund Burke exposed the cheapness of such grand moralizing when he noted:

'Hypocrisy can afford to be magnificent in its promises, for never intending to go beyond promise, it costs nothing.'

Their proclamations of moral clarity are a transactional illusion. Until their outrage extends past their own tribe to the children facing down artillery in the Levant, their moral lectures are nothing but empty noise, and their civilization stands exposed as a gilded monument to hypocrisy.

This total collapse of universal empathy leaves a devastating psychological wake. It forces a complete and irreversible alienation between those who witness this slaughter and the society that sanctions it. When you realize that the person sitting across from you in the marketplace, the office, or the public square is capable of looking at the clinical erasure of your people and calling it 'justice', the very possibility of normal human interaction shatters.

How can one engage in the casual, face-to-face pleasantries of daily life with individuals whose worldview masks a dormant, bloodthirsty barbarism? To protect the soul from the volatile rage that such proximity breeds, complete social withdrawal becomes a matter of moral survival. We choose separation not out of weakness, but to preserve our humanity from the contamination of their apathy. It is a quiet, deliberate exit from a compromised social fabric.

Let there be no lingering hope for reconciliation, no soft prayers for their redemption. They have traded their conscience for the spoils of empire, and in doing so, they have forfeited their right to grace. May Allah, the Lord of the Worlds, turn away from their pleas and make the very skies a witness to their rejection when the weight of their cruelty finally breaks them. I pray that Allah denies them His light, shuts the gates of His mercy, and leaves them to wander blindly in the darkness of their own making. Let no guidance find these monsters; let them face the eternal fire of Jahannam, utterly consumed by the justice of the Almighty.

Lora Davis's avatar

American here. I'm truly afraid of the current administration here in u.s. And angry and ashamed. This is not who we are.

Abhishek Singh Chauhan's avatar

Iran treats the Trump administration’s latest chest‑thumping like stale noise — empty threats from a crew already dragging the bruises of its most humiliating Gulf setback. Washington barks, Tehran answers with steel, and the whole cycle looks like a tired rerun. This time Iran wants the bluff dragged to its bitter end: no face‑saving pause, no heroic spin, just the superpower forced to swallow the mess it made while the region watches the tough‑guy act collapse again.

Stella-del-Sur's avatar

We’ll see how they get on . . .

Stella-del-Sur's avatar

Let’s see how they get on . . .

Ticasoart's avatar

thay cant

iran is strong

iran stand with palestine 48 years bro

we are strong

Wolfgang Exel Watson's avatar

Just like in the proxy war in Ukraine. Same actors, same strategy - same failure. Provoke retaliation and then blame the illegally attacked nation for defending itself - because everybody knows who the only entity that has a right to defend itself is.

Time to get rid of the string pullers everywhere.