Wow - the young man in the video is more eloquent and principled than most adults. Thanks for the great reporting and warning about using our media literacy skills whenever we see coverage of this situation.
Great article and completely on point! In Australia we are also seeing migration weaponised and migrants blamed for issues they are not responsible for. They are just convenient scapegoats used by the powerful to divert attention and, unfortunately, too many people are still falling for the ruse.
I had no idea this was going on! It sounds like France is following the USA to become a "make money through WAR" nation -- not a citizens HEALTH, HAPPINESS, and PROSPERITY nation.
The USA:
1. Impoverished working class
2. Endless war thanks to Israel and a Congress that profits from the armaments industry.
3. Militarized police
4. Per capita, the USA has the largest prison population in the world. The US = 4.2% of the global population but 20% of the incarcerated.
5. Corporations legally exploit the vulnerable
6. Wealth transfering into the billionaire class. Vanishing middle class = only the uber wealthy and the poor (the rest of us).
7. Legislative bodies, courts, & media all hostage to corporate power.
8. Unaffordable health care, housing, medications, food, and education.
9. Non-living wages.
10. Student debt. Many nations have free college education but they don't pay for Israel's bombs or their health care.
11. Increasing environmental damage and degradation. Global warming.
12. The Imperial Boomerang effect = surveillance, repression, and AI violence (developed by Israel's IDF to control foreign populations) eventually "boomerang" back and are used against its own citizens (like ICE and Flock cameras).
These wars of our own creation are bankrupting the nation morally and financially at home.
All nations deserve a government that tax the rich (who currently avoid taxes at all costs!) and provide an enviroment where citizens can live, work, and thrive.
A great read. And it sums up the trajectory of this world. War is business and we will all suffer because of it. Some countries may not have bombs falling on them but will be destroyed in other ways.
Why do you have to bring Tehran into it Mr Eldin? Why do you have to both sides it? Iran is the subject of an existential regime change war and the American-Zionist axis proudly boasted that Mossad was on the ground in Iran. We already know that a limited and peaceful demonstration by Iranian shopkeepers was co-opted by western agent provocateurs.
Agree! There is no correlation between the demonstrations in Teheran and those in France. Yes, there is a neoliberal opposition in Iran lured by the Hollywood mirage of Western "democracy", but it is largely funded by psyop intel funding. However, even these people must realize by now that the neocons operating the "coalition of the willing" have no qualms about eliminating humanity as collateral damage.
The problem has been festering for a long time and it is evident that French society is polarized with no simple solutions. The students have legitimate grievances but we can be sure there are nihilistic elements in the rioting that have a quite different agenda.
In one of the videos above, the student interviewed responded "we've already tried fascism, that was 1940" in a question implying the National Front might be an alternative. However, is what the media calls "the far right" actually fascism, or is it a movement to regain sovereignty from a supranational federation that has embraced a militarist agenda that resembles the fascism of 1940 much more than the nationalistic revival expressed by the National Front?
Of course, if we accept the zionist account that Marine LePen's father was "anti-semitic" it's easy to assume his daughter was raised with the same bias. But we all know zionists paint anyone as anti-semitic who opposes their agenda or criticizes Israel.
Macron is a product of the Rothschild bank. As such, his ambition lies with the fascist agenda of the EU; increase personal wealth and obtain glory by waging war against a wealthy Russian federation and thereby, pilfer and plunder its resources.
Mélenchon is a doctrinaire socialist, incapable of reaching out to the right to make necessary compromises that could alleviate the polarization that now besets France. I'm not sure if Marine LePen or any designated candidate of the National Front would be better. However, at least in my mind, no politician could be farther "right" than a warmonger despite media distortion of terminology.
"However, is what the media calls 'the far right' actually fascism, or is it a movement to regain sovereignty from a supranational federation that has embraced a militarist agenda that resembles the fascism of 1940 much more than the nationalistic revival expressed by the National Front?" Could you clarify which parties/movements you're referencing with this question? I would also appreciate any sources you have about the nihilistic elements you've mentioned.
The media has consistently labelled any movement that opposes Brussels' agenda as "far right". This includes some very diverse politicians, some of which have been barred from running for office e.g. Georgescu(Romania)or have since been targeted for removal from office, Orban(Hungary). It also includes some genuine socialists e.g. Fico(Slovakia) and some opportunists e.g. Georgia Meloni (Italy) and, of course, Putin. It also includes any opponent of globalism outside the EU, e.g. George Galloway(UK).
The far right label has also been applied to Donald Trump to further conflate the issue. However, I would put Trump into the "opportunist" category. Marine LePen has been saddled with the same epithet but it's really too early to know whether she has adjusted her anti-globalist stance to become an opportunist like Meloni or a genuine "French patriot".
My point here is that the old left/right terminology has been deliberately conflated by media under intel/zionist influence.
Oh now I get your point. Thanks for the clarification. Though I would imagine this conflation has more to do with imperialism, expansionism, and politics of domination more broadly and less with Zionism in itself. Meaning, the EU countries as a whole and as separate parts do not need Zionism to want to crush dissent and sow division. They've been doing that before the rise of modern Zionism and they have means, motives, and opportunities that are not related to Zionism. Politics of domination that treat some lives as disposable and the Other as a threat are a way for Empire / rulers to consolidate power & control - and that includes European rulers that do not embrace Zionism. That's why some rulers happily point the fingers when dissent is crushed elsewhere but will crush it at home without batting an eye.
Imperialism has pretty much merged with zionism in the US, UK and the central authority of the EU in Brussels. This is done through slush funds dedicated to regime change in dissident nations. NGOs like The National Endowment for Democracy and Open Society(George Soros’ foundation) are given innocuous names but are dedicated to subversive activities in targeted nations. Think Tanks are also well funded by the same sources, while others e.g. US AIDE, tap US taxpayers. Numerous NGOs designated as charities e.g. The Clinton Foundation support similar activieies. Journalists who are notoriously underpaid are often bought for propaganda purposes and become script deliverers for their sponsors( as was the case of Udo Ulfcotte).
In addition, online search engines are tweaked to prioritize official propaganda while censoring alternative views.
This is all done with money, whether we call it sponsorship, bribes, blackmail or buying influence. The sources are varied according to their perceived interest. Military contractors, pharmaceuticals and zionists all have a hand in conflating public opinion.
Following: Interview with Udo Ulcotte( subtiles- the English version seems to have been scrubbed from the inteernet)
Great report, thanks. I’d seen the mayor defending the students but not that student talking. Just one thing - this began with teacher shortages. I think the teacher leadership and Melenchon need to step in and demand more changes from the government or these riots will continue. And then I can see very few people wanting to be teachers under these circumstances. So the problem will get worse.
Wow - the young man in the video is more eloquent and principled than most adults. Thanks for the great reporting and warning about using our media literacy skills whenever we see coverage of this situation.
Great article and completely on point! In Australia we are also seeing migration weaponised and migrants blamed for issues they are not responsible for. They are just convenient scapegoats used by the powerful to divert attention and, unfortunately, too many people are still falling for the ruse.
I had no idea this was going on! It sounds like France is following the USA to become a "make money through WAR" nation -- not a citizens HEALTH, HAPPINESS, and PROSPERITY nation.
The USA:
1. Impoverished working class
2. Endless war thanks to Israel and a Congress that profits from the armaments industry.
3. Militarized police
4. Per capita, the USA has the largest prison population in the world. The US = 4.2% of the global population but 20% of the incarcerated.
5. Corporations legally exploit the vulnerable
6. Wealth transfering into the billionaire class. Vanishing middle class = only the uber wealthy and the poor (the rest of us).
7. Legislative bodies, courts, & media all hostage to corporate power.
8. Unaffordable health care, housing, medications, food, and education.
9. Non-living wages.
10. Student debt. Many nations have free college education but they don't pay for Israel's bombs or their health care.
11. Increasing environmental damage and degradation. Global warming.
12. The Imperial Boomerang effect = surveillance, repression, and AI violence (developed by Israel's IDF to control foreign populations) eventually "boomerang" back and are used against its own citizens (like ICE and Flock cameras).
These wars of our own creation are bankrupting the nation morally and financially at home.
All nations deserve a government that tax the rich (who currently avoid taxes at all costs!) and provide an enviroment where citizens can live, work, and thrive.
A great read. And it sums up the trajectory of this world. War is business and we will all suffer because of it. Some countries may not have bombs falling on them but will be destroyed in other ways.
Why do you have to bring Tehran into it Mr Eldin? Why do you have to both sides it? Iran is the subject of an existential regime change war and the American-Zionist axis proudly boasted that Mossad was on the ground in Iran. We already know that a limited and peaceful demonstration by Iranian shopkeepers was co-opted by western agent provocateurs.
Agree! There is no correlation between the demonstrations in Teheran and those in France. Yes, there is a neoliberal opposition in Iran lured by the Hollywood mirage of Western "democracy", but it is largely funded by psyop intel funding. However, even these people must realize by now that the neocons operating the "coalition of the willing" have no qualms about eliminating humanity as collateral damage.
The problem has been festering for a long time and it is evident that French society is polarized with no simple solutions. The students have legitimate grievances but we can be sure there are nihilistic elements in the rioting that have a quite different agenda.
In one of the videos above, the student interviewed responded "we've already tried fascism, that was 1940" in a question implying the National Front might be an alternative. However, is what the media calls "the far right" actually fascism, or is it a movement to regain sovereignty from a supranational federation that has embraced a militarist agenda that resembles the fascism of 1940 much more than the nationalistic revival expressed by the National Front?
Of course, if we accept the zionist account that Marine LePen's father was "anti-semitic" it's easy to assume his daughter was raised with the same bias. But we all know zionists paint anyone as anti-semitic who opposes their agenda or criticizes Israel.
Macron is a product of the Rothschild bank. As such, his ambition lies with the fascist agenda of the EU; increase personal wealth and obtain glory by waging war against a wealthy Russian federation and thereby, pilfer and plunder its resources.
Mélenchon is a doctrinaire socialist, incapable of reaching out to the right to make necessary compromises that could alleviate the polarization that now besets France. I'm not sure if Marine LePen or any designated candidate of the National Front would be better. However, at least in my mind, no politician could be farther "right" than a warmonger despite media distortion of terminology.
"However, is what the media calls 'the far right' actually fascism, or is it a movement to regain sovereignty from a supranational federation that has embraced a militarist agenda that resembles the fascism of 1940 much more than the nationalistic revival expressed by the National Front?" Could you clarify which parties/movements you're referencing with this question? I would also appreciate any sources you have about the nihilistic elements you've mentioned.
The media has consistently labelled any movement that opposes Brussels' agenda as "far right". This includes some very diverse politicians, some of which have been barred from running for office e.g. Georgescu(Romania)or have since been targeted for removal from office, Orban(Hungary). It also includes some genuine socialists e.g. Fico(Slovakia) and some opportunists e.g. Georgia Meloni (Italy) and, of course, Putin. It also includes any opponent of globalism outside the EU, e.g. George Galloway(UK).
The far right label has also been applied to Donald Trump to further conflate the issue. However, I would put Trump into the "opportunist" category. Marine LePen has been saddled with the same epithet but it's really too early to know whether she has adjusted her anti-globalist stance to become an opportunist like Meloni or a genuine "French patriot".
My point here is that the old left/right terminology has been deliberately conflated by media under intel/zionist influence.
Oh now I get your point. Thanks for the clarification. Though I would imagine this conflation has more to do with imperialism, expansionism, and politics of domination more broadly and less with Zionism in itself. Meaning, the EU countries as a whole and as separate parts do not need Zionism to want to crush dissent and sow division. They've been doing that before the rise of modern Zionism and they have means, motives, and opportunities that are not related to Zionism. Politics of domination that treat some lives as disposable and the Other as a threat are a way for Empire / rulers to consolidate power & control - and that includes European rulers that do not embrace Zionism. That's why some rulers happily point the fingers when dissent is crushed elsewhere but will crush it at home without batting an eye.
Imperialism has pretty much merged with zionism in the US, UK and the central authority of the EU in Brussels. This is done through slush funds dedicated to regime change in dissident nations. NGOs like The National Endowment for Democracy and Open Society(George Soros’ foundation) are given innocuous names but are dedicated to subversive activities in targeted nations. Think Tanks are also well funded by the same sources, while others e.g. US AIDE, tap US taxpayers. Numerous NGOs designated as charities e.g. The Clinton Foundation support similar activieies. Journalists who are notoriously underpaid are often bought for propaganda purposes and become script deliverers for their sponsors( as was the case of Udo Ulfcotte).
In addition, online search engines are tweaked to prioritize official propaganda while censoring alternative views.
This is all done with money, whether we call it sponsorship, bribes, blackmail or buying influence. The sources are varied according to their perceived interest. Military contractors, pharmaceuticals and zionists all have a hand in conflating public opinion.
Following: Interview with Udo Ulcotte( subtiles- the English version seems to have been scrubbed from the inteernet)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Sh_hpyNw4E
Great report Ahmed. And nice finish...look for ourselves before jumping on bandwaggons. 👍🔥
Great report, thanks. I’d seen the mayor defending the students but not that student talking. Just one thing - this began with teacher shortages. I think the teacher leadership and Melenchon need to step in and demand more changes from the government or these riots will continue. And then I can see very few people wanting to be teachers under these circumstances. So the problem will get worse.
Great article, a brief one, straight to the point. Very informative plus insightful tips in the last paragraph.